Overall, the good parts: tension is there, cinematography is beautiful once again and we get to see some good acting. Sound editing is great also in this one, but maybe there were more speech moments than needed. Also, it's not as quiet as the first film. I would want to mention a few which I m sure many noticed but better not to spoil it. So the story ends up with flaws, which disappoint mostly because of the predictability and the too many cliches. Also, the motives of the protagonists were at times unjustified, just to push the story forward. Now in part 2, I have a feeling that the story was a bit of a stretch. Yes, they were used in the 1st film too, but at least then they were timed and deployed better, so the tension was nicely built and a sense of unpredictability was evident. For example, the tropes used in this film, are all the classics. In part 2 however, you kind of know exactly what is about to happen and that lessens the film experience. Here is an overall difference with the first film: In the first one, there was a clear storyline, almost no plot holes, novelty and the right amount of tension. There's a few problems with it and most of them are in the storyline. A ramification of the analysis is that P-stranding in Dutch and German is in fact the stranding of a remnant phrase that contains the R-pronoun by a projection containing the preposition.Although AQPII is not bad, it does look like an attempt to cash in. German auf, ‘on’) are shown to pronounce different parts of the aforementioned clausal structure. The morphemes making up locative pronouns such as Dutch daar/German da, ‘there’, and place adpositions (e.g. Noonan argues that a comparative approach to these closely related Germanic languages warrants the decomposition of function words into parts not traditionally recognised as morphemes. The empirical evidence comes (i) from a comparison of the morphosyntactic distribution of the “r” in German and Dutch so-called R-pronouns (locative pronouns) and P-stranding constructions, and (ii) from complex spatial PPs in Colloquial German.
The guiding hypothesis and theoretical backdrop is that an extended clausal structure is generalised to all categories, including adpositions, (P).
This chapter provides an exploration of the fine structure of R-pronouns, spatial PPs, and P-stranding constructions.
0 kommentar(er)
